On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 9:19 AM, William Grzybowski <willia...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Nicola Vitale <ni...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> [2013/11/22 William Grzybowski <willia...@gmail.com>] >>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Nicola Vitale <ni...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> If so, in my opinion the cause may be this change to bsd.python.mk: >>>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=322046 >>> >>> In my opinion its not really a cause, how else would you do that? We >>> are dealing with packages, I don't see another way to install the >>> packages if not manually poking with easy-install.pth. >> >> Yes, of course. Or we can use easy_install command again... > > It would just make it more complex, plus we would need to rebuild all > easy_install packages. Unless I'm missing something more obvious > >>> Sure, but the only way around that I see is manually creating the >>> easy-install.pth, or figure out a way to tel setuptools to, >> >> In fact, and why did you not add that file? Obviously we could create >> a simple port as a run dependency of setuptools, that installs only >> that file with a minimal content, so not having to worry about it when >> you update setuptools. > > Because I've been quite busy with work and had no time to figure out > how to manually create that file, I need to investigate if it is > somehow platform agnostic or what. > I see no reason to create a new port but bundle it with setuptools.
I took some time and verified easy-install.pth has no magic involved in the source code (setuptools/easy_install.py) and added the static file files/easy_install.pth.dist. I've sent it for another exp-run, lets see how it goes this time. -- William Grzybowski ------------------------------------------ Curitiba/PR - Brasil _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
