On 2013-11-22 16:46, Nicola Vitale wrote:
Hi,
[2013/11/22 William Grzybowski <willia...@gmail.com>]
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Nicola Vitale <ni...@freebsd.org>
wrote:
If so, in my opinion the cause may be this change to bsd.python.mk:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=322046
In my opinion its not really a cause, how else would you do that? We
are dealing with packages, I don't see another way to install the
packages if not manually poking with easy-install.pth.
Yes, of course. Or we can use easy_install command again...
Sure, but the only way around that I see is manually creating the
easy-install.pth, or figure out a way to tel setuptools to,
In fact, and why did you not add that file? Obviously we could create
a simple port as a run dependency of setuptools, that installs only
that file with a minimal content, so not having to worry about it when
you update setuptools.
Wouldn't it be better to package it as an extra file *with* setuptools?
If it's only used by setuptools, creating a separate dummy port seems
odd.
Just add it to files/ or something.
- Nikolai Lifanov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
