On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Nicola Vitale <ni...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > >> [2013/11/22 William Grzybowski <willia...@gmail.com>] >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Nicola Vitale <ni...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> If so, in my opinion the cause may be this change to bsd.python.mk: >>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=322046 >> >> In my opinion its not really a cause, how else would you do that? We >> are dealing with packages, I don't see another way to install the >> packages if not manually poking with easy-install.pth. > > Yes, of course. Or we can use easy_install command again...
It would just make it more complex, plus we would need to rebuild all easy_install packages. Unless I'm missing something more obvious >> Sure, but the only way around that I see is manually creating the >> easy-install.pth, or figure out a way to tel setuptools to, > > In fact, and why did you not add that file? Obviously we could create > a simple port as a run dependency of setuptools, that installs only > that file with a minimal content, so not having to worry about it when > you update setuptools. Because I've been quite busy with work and had no time to figure out how to manually create that file, I need to investigate if it is somehow platform agnostic or what. I see no reason to create a new port but bundle it with setuptools. -- William Grzybowski ------------------------------------------ Curitiba/PR - Brasil _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"