On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:28:40 +0100 Marko Cupać <marko.cu...@mimar.rs> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:23:15 -0500 > Robert Simmons <rsimmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > That is true. It looks like an update to both 3.5 and 3.4 were > > released on the same day. How about dropping www/squid33 and > > creating a www/squid34 port. Then updating the www/squid port to > > 3.5.2. > > I would say this is a bad idea, as squid 3.5 does not work on FreeBSD > 10.1 with GENERIC kernel. Furthermore, it won't be fixed with > binary patches (ie. until 10.2 or 11.0). > > I think www/squid should be recommended squid version for FreeBSD > users. It wouldn't be appropriate to recommend version which does not > work without recompiling kernel. > > We discussed it not so long ago: > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freebsd-ports@freebsd.org&q=subject:%22Re%3A+www%2Fsquid+does+not+shutdown+via+rc%22&o=newest I have just installed www/squid33 because I wanted to avoid compiling custom kernel, but apparently it does not shutdown via rc either. I think we are closer to conclusion that no version of squid can be controlled with included rc scripts on 10.1-pX. Perhaps users who install squid on 10.1 should be warned somehow (pkg message or something). -- Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
