On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:23:15 -0500 Robert Simmons <rsimmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is true. It looks like an update to both 3.5 and 3.4 were > released on the same day. How about dropping www/squid33 and creating > a www/squid34 port. Then updating the www/squid port to 3.5.2. I would say this is a bad idea, as squid 3.5 does not work on FreeBSD 10.1 with GENERIC kernel. Furthermore, it won't be fixed with binary patches (ie. until 10.2 or 11.0). I think www/squid should be recommended squid version for FreeBSD users. It wouldn't be appropriate to recommend version which does not work without recompiling kernel. We discussed it not so long ago: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freebsd-ports@freebsd.org&q=subject:%22Re%3A+www%2Fsquid+does+not+shutdown+via+rc%22&o=newest -- Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
