On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:57:43AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I don't think it's about building ports. It's about the list of what I > need to have installed and maintained on our systems. And with this > split to more packages, then the list will grow and tracking of changes > and dependencies will become hell like on Linux distributions. > Exactly why I proposed to have the full package be the default and have the split packages as options for those who want it. For you, it will still only be one package to install and include the things you are used to today, binaries, libraries, etc., but for those who want can install just the separate packages.
Erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk er...@freebsd.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
