On, Tue Jun 26, 2012, Mark Felder wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:31:40 -0500, Andrea Venturoli <m...@netfence.it> > wrote: > > > > > The "effort" will be 3x processing time for portupgrade (or whatever) to > > update the package database 3 times as much as before. > > pkgng uses sqlite. Please provide proof that it is as slow or slower than > our current package database is.
If I am trying to convince a customer of some solution X, I usually do not tell him to provide proof that the offered solution is worse than the current one when negotiating. Instead I try to convince him that the offered solution is better, more robust, future-proof, easier to maintain and saves tons of money. Please do not validate a system as good, just because noone yet provided some figures that outline that the existing system is in fact worse. That said, I might assume that the sqlite solution is faster, but noone can see that yet. Cheers Marcus
pgpppmwwlATqu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
