On 06/26/12 16:34, Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:31:40 -0500, Andrea Venturoli <m...@netfence.it>
wrote:
The "effort" will be 3x processing time for portupgrade (or whatever)
to update the package database 3 times as much as before.
pkgng uses sqlite. Please provide proof that it is as slow or slower
than our current package database is.
I cannot.
However I don't think that's the point.
A faster DB system with 3X records might perform better or worse than
current DB system with X records; even if the balance was positive, it
would still be slower than the new DB system with X records.
That is still a reason against splitting in the wild.
bye
av.
P.S.
I'd gladly try sqlite instead of the current pkgdb and see: is it
possible to switch without any side-effect or complication?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
