On 6/1/2012 12:13 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> I hate WITHOUT_NLS and NO_PORTDOCS with a passion. They work for 80% of
> the ports you are likely to install, so they are not a safe way to
> escape docs or NLS. Why bother? Seriously, could someone give me a
> usecase for them?
I don't need the !English language support offered by NLS/gettext, so
prefer not to have the extra space consumed on my hard drives whenever
possible. Is anything in software ever truly a 100% solution? That said,
I agree that the default should be "ON" for the purpose of package
building, and if the whole knob went away I wouldn't lose sleep.
I don't use NOPORTDOCS personally, but I can see the use case for it,
and don't mind putting in the effort to support it in my ports.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
