On 12-5-2012 5:41, Erwin Lansing wrote: > All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG
Sorry to jump in late, but it just occurred to me that I have a valid case for "zero or 1" multi options or implemented slightly different, a case for "if single is on, multigroup needs one, else multigroup must be 0" The specific case is this: - User can opt to force runtime dependency on a web server by selecting one of 4 or none. Same for mail server (3 choices). While these ports do not necessarily conflict, there can be conflicting entries and as such I prefer to narrow the choice to one. Makes more sense too for the practical case. I currently have this implemented in old options, but I don't see a clear way to do this with optionsng as the minimum for multi options is 1. I can of course present these as they are now, 3-4 simple options with custom logic. -- Mel _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"