On 3/28/12 1:06 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped
if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change.
For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the library
only, and changes the +CONTENTS and +REQUIRED_BY of the various
installed packages appropriately. And the program will still work just
fine. So PORTREVISION should not be bumped.
I'm fairly sure thats exactly backwards. I believe you're talking about
our 'Chase sh lib version bump' commits which most definitely require a
bump even if the major version doesn't change, b/c the old packages will
reference the old library.
Take devel/apr-1 for example.
So, basically, you do enough pr's, you will bump portrevision and
someone will complain, and you will skip bumping portrevision and
someone will complain :-)
10 programmers, 15 opinions.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
