On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped > if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change. > For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the library > only, and changes the +CONTENTS and +REQUIRED_BY of the various > installed packages appropriately. And the program will still work just > fine. So PORTREVISION should not be bumped. I'm fairly sure thats exactly backwards. I believe you're talking about our 'Chase sh lib version bump' commits which most definitely require a bump even if the major version doesn't change, b/c the old packages will reference the old library.
Take devel/apr-1 for example. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
