On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > If it's unconditionally included, how does that exempt it from exp-runs? > > Surely it's equally risky to commit to it as bsd.port.mk, or have I missed > something?
In a perfect world we'd have -exp runs for everything, I suppose. OTOH here in the real world there's plenty of lower-risk changes that can be done without. If in doubt, we can always do one. Take a look a the various commits in ports/Mk for examples of what's been done in the past. mcl _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
