On 16 Jul 2011 22:26, "Mark Linimon" <lini...@lonesome.com> wrote: > > > If bsd.perl.mk is going to be included unconditionally, what's the > > point of having it in a separate file? > > - perl team can make changes (e.g. minor version update of perl) > without -exp run and portmgr approval. (I would still prefer to do > -exp runs for major version updates, of course). > > - easier to read the code. >
If it's unconditionally included, how does that exempt it from exp-runs? Surely it's equally risky to commit to it as bsd.port.mk, or have I missed something? Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
