On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:36:16 +0200 > Vasil Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Interesting: > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host > > mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; > > Client host [82.103.104.21] blocked using bg.countries.nerd.dk; Your > > IP is in bg, rejected based on geographical location (in reply to > > RCPT TO command) > > > > Do you really block all mails coming from Bulgaria? > > Romania also. > > Dec 28 14:48:57 it postfix/smtp[42226]: 05C3A1711B: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > relay=mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117]:25, delay=14, delays=0.2/0.15/2.6/11, > dsn=5.7.1, sta > tus=bounced (host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service > unavailable; Client host [81.196.204.98] blocked using ro.countries.nerd.dk; > Your IP is in ro, rejected b > ased on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command)) [...] > Since I saw others doing this, I'd really like a statement from portmgr > (BCC'ed) that commiters and maintainers are not allowed to reject mail > like this. I, for one, would commit via instant maintainer timeout to > ports belonging this type of maintainers.
Yeah, you can assume timeout has triggered if you get such a bounce - if you cannot inform a maintainer obviously he will not reply in 14 days... -- Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] % A: Yes. | Q: Are you sure? | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
pgpKC7Sqo7UKn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
