On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:03:57 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:24:49AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > I'd suggest using not using an absolute path in the TAR definition
> > > since the dependency check doesn't and using 502111 as the version since
> > > that's the first version bump after the initial bsdtar import. Not that
> > > we really need to worry about such early 5.x release, but it's more
> > > correct.
> >
> > Thanks again, Brooks. The patch will include (if Kris won't complain):
> > -----
> > .if ${OSVERSION} < 502111
> > EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= bsdtar:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/libarchive
> > TAR= bsdtar
> > .endif
> > -----
> Actually I think you do need the absolute path, since it wont always
> be set in the environment (think crontabs, etc). The correct
> specification would be ${LOCALBASE}/bin/bsdtar.
OK. The final patch (I hope) and an example for The Porters Handbook:
-----
.if ${OSVERSION} < 502111
EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= bsdtar:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/libarchive
TAR= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/bsdtar
.endif
-----
Thanks all who participated in the thread, especially Brooks, Kris and
Pav. ;-)
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
