On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:24:49AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > >
> > > > > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
> > > > > distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at
> > > > > 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using
> > > > > USE_BZIP2 knob and doing gunzipping at after-extract:.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does someone know a better solution?
> > > > > Does we have examples at our ports?
> > >
> > > > Use a do-extract that extracts all distfiles or EXTRACT_ONLY with
> > > > post-extract that extracts the other ones.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Kris. I'm trying to test (actually, to find an 4.x system)
> > > some broken ports with a patch(es) which includes (thanks Brooks):
> > > -----
> > > .if ${OSVERSION} < 500000
> > > EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= bsdtar:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/libarchive
> > > TAR= /usr/local/bin/bsdtar
> > > .endif
> > > -----
> > >
> > > To me that seems a good solution.
>
> > I'd suggest using not using an absolute path in the TAR definition
> > since the dependency check doesn't and using 502111 as the version since
> > that's the first version bump after the initial bsdtar import. Not that
> > we really need to worry about such early 5.x release, but it's more
> > correct.
>
> Thanks again, Brooks. The patch will include (if Kris won't complain):
> -----
> .if ${OSVERSION} < 502111
> EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= bsdtar:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/libarchive
> TAR= bsdtar
> .endif
> -----
Actually I think you do need the absolute path, since it wont always
be set in the environment (think crontabs, etc). The correct
specification would be ${LOCALBASE}/bin/bsdtar.
Kris
pgpl6CiT45SWv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
