Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:20:55 +0200):
> So you prefer imposing yet another dependency on the user is less evil > than adding few lines of extra code in port Makefile? > > Interesting PoV. We're talking about 4.x. It's on the way out. So it's about increased complexity (own do-extract target) on the well supported systems, or about another dependency on the old and "we support it if it isn't a hassle" versions. For the linux ports Boris is needing this part, I vote for another dependency (like we have already with USE_GCC in other ports). Bye, Alexander. -- Robot priest: And so we commend Vladimir's remains to the earth: filings to filings, rust to rust. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
