Max Laier wrote:
Okay, but why? Is there any reason you can't use pftpx (or the newer version of ftp-proxy) from the ports tree? Why does ftp-proxy have to be in base?
Why does named, or tftp, or openssh, or ntp, or,.. or...Why shouldn't there be have a fully packaged pf implementation in the base OS?
_______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
