On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Max Laier wrote:
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anything else?
ftp-proxy(8) and tftp-proxy(8) would be nice...
... I'm at it. Could you maybe lend a hand with importing
libevent[1] which is a requirement for ftp-proxy now? It should make
a good addition to base anyhow - as a convenient (and portable)
interface to kqueue.
Convenient and portable, but buggy as hell - we used it in Varnish to
begin with but had to ditch it due to a combination of design flaws and
bugs. It also suffers from creeping featuritis - the latest version
includes a DNS resolver and a full HTTP implementation... it's only a
matter of time before it grows a lisp interpreter and a mail reader.
hmmm ... okay, didn't know that. But what do you suggest as an
alternative? I certainly won't reinvent the wheel for the libevent calls
in ftp-proxy. Importing libevent code private to ftp-proxy seems equally
wrong. So the alternatives - to me at least - are either importing
libevent or leaveing ftp-proxy in ports. Pick your poison.
ports.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
