On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:43:10PM +0800, LI Xin wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > [...] > > How do people feel about removing ftp-proxy from the base altogether? I > > think it's better off in ports anyway. Opinions? I would vote for including pftpx (the newer version in OpenBSD) iirc. Almost a year ago I've made an ftp service where the ftpd was jailed to a local IP address, and i had to use ftp-proxy for this propose. This reverse-proxying stuff couldn't be achived with the ftp-proxy in base, so i had to use the later version, which has the name pftpx in the ports tree. I'd vote for replacing ftp-proxy with pftpx. > > /me vote for this. > > Cheers, > -- > Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.delphij.net/ > FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! >
Bye, Gergely Czuczy mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise.
pgpBcL1RJdrNw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
