Martin MATO wrote: > István a écrit : > > have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff? > > you might have overlooked it. > > yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :) > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael [1]<s4mm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think > this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read
That's possibly true, but the huge difference in threaded I/O and memory copy can't be explained by simply leaving debug switches to ON. > > > the > > > documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is > available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark. > > > What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this > version, but test results are the same as in 8.0 > Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason > to be suprised. UFS2 has its benefits, even over ZFS (less memory, speed in some cases). _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
