have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff? you might have overlooked it.
yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :) On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael <s4mm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think > > this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read > the > > documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is > > available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark. > What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this > version, but test results are the same as in 8.0 > Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason > to be suprised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- the sun shines for all _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
