but if we measure the performance based on feelings we could advertise freebsd:
"feels better" do not forget the marketing value :)) On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Kip Macy <kip.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:21 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Well, since FreeBSD 8.0 started, I realized on several boxes (doens't >> matter whether SMP or UP, 2 GB or 8 GB or 16 GB) massive performance >> issues when compiling, even on a 8-core box. This is not 'measured' in >> > > hard numbers, it is the 'feeling' since we swapped to 8.0, but still >> crunching (oh, we need a lot of I/O performance in those number >> crunching environments) and even simple desktop, Linux, mostly Ubuntu >> and RedHat, outperforms FreeBSD. >> > > > We certainly do periodically have performance issues, but it isn't > realistic to expect us to tune for how it "feels" to you. Performance on > concrete workloads would contribute a great deal more to the discussion. > > > -Kip > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- the sun shines for all _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
