On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:15 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 05:46 -0700, Warren Block wrote: > > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > Was trolling around inside of bce(4) and the Broadcom docs today and > > > made the following update to the man page. Thoughts? > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/bce_man.txt > > > > Nice! > > > > Just minor suggestions. > > > > The two "whether or not" sentences ought to be just "Enable/Disable ..." > > like the rest. > > > > A couple of "Cannot be assigned the value 0" sentences can be simpler as > > "Cannot be set to 0" if that doesn't change the meaning. > > > > "Valid values are in the range from 0-256." can be simpler as > > "Values from 0-256 are valid." > > > > Many "The default value is" which could be simplified to "The default > > is", or added to the end of a previous sentence as an aside: > > "Values from 0-100 are valid (default 18)." > > > Indeed. Much more gooder wordingness. Updated! > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/bce_man.txt > > Sean >
Updated again, looks like one of the tuneables has changed in -head: hw.bce.loose_rx_mtu --> hw.bce.strict_rx_mtu Sean _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
