On 02/27/2011 12:23, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 08/02/2011 03:47 p.m., Doug Barton wrote:
[catching up with e-mail]
I've been up and running on this patch vs. r218391 for over 24 hours
now, using algorithm 4 (as someone said is now the default in Linux)
without any problems.
I think Bjoern is better qualified than I to comment on the style of the
patch, but it applies cleanly, and seems to run fine on both v4 and v6.
Has this been commited to the tree, already? -- If so, what's the
default algorithm?
Bjoern was planning to do it, I'm going to do it if he doesn't get
around to it.
As for default algorithm, is there any reason not to make it 4?
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
