On 01/28/2011 11:57, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Doug Barton<do...@freebsd.org>  wrote:

How does net.inet.ip.portrange.randomalg sound? I would also suggest that
the second sysctl be named net.inet.ip.portrange.randomalg.alg5_tradeoff so
that one could do 'sysctl net.inet.ip.portrange.randomalg' and see both
values. But I won't quibble on that. :)


I have no objections with this. Since this is my first attempt to
contribute something back to the community I decided to see how it's
done before. So I found:
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323
net.inet.tcp.rfc3465
net.inet.tcp.rfc3390
net.inet.tcp.rfc3042
which probably led me in a wrong direction :)

Yeah, I had actually intended to say something to the effect of "there are plenty of unfortunate examples in the tree already so your doing it that way is totally understandable" but I trimmed it.

I understand your point and agree with it. However, my somewhat
limited understanding of the sysctl internal organization is telling
me that tree node does not support values. Am I wrong?

You are likely correct. :) It's an inconvenient fact that often forget because that's not the sandbox that I usually play in.

If my reasoning
is correct, maybe I can create the sysctl variables with the following
names:
- net.inet.ip.portrange.randomalg (Tree Node)
- net.inet.ip.portrange.randomalg.alg[orithm] (Leaf Node, to store the
selected algorithm)

I would go with "version" to increase the visual distinctiveness. I searched the current tree and there doesn't seem to be a clear winner for how to portray "this is the current N/M that is in use" but "version" seems to have the most representatives.

- net.inet.ip.portrange.randomalg.alg5_tradeoff (Leaf Node, to store
the Algorithm 5 trade-off value)

I'm assuming this is the "N" value mentioned in the RFC. If so, I commend you on your choice of "tradeoff" to represent it. :)


hth,

Doug

--

        Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
                        -- OK Go

        Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
        Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to