On 30 Sep 2010, at 20:16, Doug Barton wrote: > On 9/30/2010 12:13 PM, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 28 Sep 2010, at 23:27, Doug Barton wrote: >> >>> On 9/22/2010 1:32 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: >>> | Hello, >>> | >>> | Can anyone try a patch for adding 6rd (RFC 5569) support to stf(4)? >>> >>> Well I don't want to be "Mr. Negativity," but I'd like to suggest that >>> adding this support is the wrong way to go. STF and teredo are >>> transition mechanisms, and we're currently knee-deep (well maybe >>> ankle-deep) in the deployment of IPv6. This is only going to pick up >>> steam in the next few years given the impending run-out of the free /8s >>> in the IANA pool. >> >> I disagree with you and I want to see this going in. > > Perhaps you could provide a little more information about the basis for your > opinion, as I attempted to do for mine? If for no other reason than to help > educate me on why I'm wrong?
I really don't feel like discussion this ad nauseum as your last IPv6 thread, but 6rd is useful and your argument about the timeline for FreeBSD 9.0 doesn't make sense: we can have this on FreeBSD 8-STABLE in a week after this is committed to HEAD. -- Rui Paulo _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
