On 9/30/2010 12:13 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 28 Sep 2010, at 23:27, Doug Barton wrote:
On 9/22/2010 1:32 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
| Hello,
|
| Can anyone try a patch for adding 6rd (RFC 5569) support to stf(4)?
Well I don't want to be "Mr. Negativity," but I'd like to suggest that
adding this support is the wrong way to go. STF and teredo are
transition mechanisms, and we're currently knee-deep (well maybe
ankle-deep) in the deployment of IPv6. This is only going to pick up
steam in the next few years given the impending run-out of the free /8s
in the IANA pool.
I disagree with you and I want to see this going in.
Perhaps you could provide a little more information about the basis for
your opinion, as I attempted to do for mine? If for no other reason than
to help educate me on why I'm wrong?
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
