Nick Rogness wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Nick Rogness wrote: > > There is no way to tell your packet to go back out to ISP #2. That is the > point I'm trying to get across. Unless your running a routing > daemon. But is that really practical with cable modems, dsl, etc?...I > don't think so. > > > > > What if you are running nat in this case....your hosed. > > > > natd on each interface is what I'm stating here...just to clarify. I sent out a mesage the other day with a suggestion as to how to this. (in fact using stateful ipfw rules we could even do better) did you see it? > -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001 ---> X_.---._/ v To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: same interface Route Cache Garrett Wollman
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Wes Peters
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Wes Peters
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Julian Elischer
- Re: same interface Route Cache Alex Pilosov
- Re: same interface Route Cache Wes Peters
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Alex Pilosov
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Julian Elischer
- Re: same interface Route Cache Julian Elischer
- Re: same interface Route Cache Alex Pilosov
- Re: same interface Route Cache Garrett Wollman
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness