Alex Pilosov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> > There is no way to tell your packet to go back out to ISP #2. That is the
> > point I'm trying to get across. Unless your running a routing
> > daemon. But is that really practical with cable modems, dsl, etc?...I
> > don't think so.
> <flame>
> Is the clue really gone from this list?
> </flame>
>
>
>
> With policy routing, you indeed will be able to multihome, without any
> cooperation of your upstream (assuming strict filters on their ingress
> interfaces) and have things work.
it should be possible to use IPFW and natd to do this:
IPFW could use Luigi's probability feature to select an interface to
use for each initiating session and ipfw could use a stateful rule
to 'remember the choice made'
The final step is to select to which divert rule the packets eventually get
sent.
Each divert rule goes to a different natd, each of which is attached to a
different outgoing interface.
>
> --
> --
> Alex Pilosov | http://www.acecape.com/dsl
> CTO - Acecape, Inc. | AceDSL:The best ADSL in Bell Atlantic area
> 325 W 38 St. Suite 1005 | (Stealth Marketing Works! :)
> New York, NY 10018 |
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001
---> X_.---._/
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
