<<On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:08:03 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Correct me if wrong, but if I recall BSD natively already held a route > cache, although it might not be the best route cache which we could come > up with. It does, but there is only a single route cached there. A better implementation might have a small hash table (e.g., 16 entries), but that could make things more complex when we decide to delete a route. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: same interface Route Cache Garrett Wollman
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Wes Peters
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Wes Peters
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Julian Elischer
- Re: same interface Route Cache Alex Pilosov
- Re: same interface Route Cache Wes Peters
- Re: same interface Route Cache Nick Rogness
- Re: same interface Route Cache Alex Pilosov