* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010726 12:51] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:18:09AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > The real reason behind all this is to make the input and output
> > > > routines symmetric, since mbuf's can be allocated at interrupt,
> > > > and clusters can't (or couldn't, last time I looked at 4.3).
> > >
> > > They can. Whether they are or not I'm not sure.
> >
> > Er, wouldn't that be the only way for cards to refil thier DMA
> > recieve buffers?
>
> Look at the Tigon II and FXP drivers. The allocations in
> the macros turn into m_get, not m_clusterget.
It looks like (at least in -current) that fxp_intr() calls
fxp_add_rfabuf() which calls MGETHDR() followed by MCLGET().
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
