Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:18:09AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > The real reason behind all this is to make the input and output > > > routines symmetric, since mbuf's can be allocated at interrupt, > > > and clusters can't (or couldn't, last time I looked at 4.3). > > > > They can. Whether they are or not I'm not sure. > > Er, wouldn't that be the only way for cards to refil thier DMA > recieve buffers? Look at the Tigon II and FXP drivers. The allocations in the macros turn into m_get, not m_clusterget. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: cluster size Zhihui Zhang
- Re: cluster size Bosko Milekic
- Re: cluster size Julian Elischer
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size vishwanath pargaonkar
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size Bosko Milekic
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size Alfred Perlstein
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size Alfred Perlstein
- Re: cluster size Bosko Milekic
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size Zhihui Zhang
- Re: cluster size Bosko Milekic
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size Bosko Milekic
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- Re: cluster size Terry Lambert
- RE: cluster size Jonathan M. Slivko