On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:51:27PM -0700, David O'Brien scribbled: | On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:59:06PM -0500, Michael C . Wu wrote: | > IIRC, KA-64 does not even have an emulator yet. | | Are you making a distinction between emulator and simulator? Such that | SimNow! and VirtuHammer don't fall into what you are speaking of? Yes, in some parts of the industry, we distinguish it based upon how much of the processor it emulates/simulates. One is considered to only do parts of the CPU, the other being what you have right now. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | http://iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itai... Terry Lambert
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Remy Nonnenmacher
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itai... Wes Peters
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Joachim Strömbergson
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium David O'Brien
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Sergey Babkin
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Leif Neland
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Andrew Reilly
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium David O'Brien
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy