"Michael C . Wu" wrote: > > With the branch prediction, cache tracing, and EPIC instructions, > you really want to use an ILP compiler. Without a compiler that > can decide on good ways to output binaries that run with all the IA-64 > innovations^Wreinvention-of-the-wheels. Anothing interesting point is that the optimisation for IA-64 seems to be highly processor-specific: the code optimized for Itanium won't be optimal for McKinley and vice versa. I've heard an estimation of about 1.5 times speed increase due to the model-specific optimisation. -SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itai... Terry Lambert
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Remy Nonnenmacher
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itai... Wes Peters
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Joachim Strömbergson
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium David O'Brien
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Sergey Babkin
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Leif Neland
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Andrew Reilly
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium David O'Brien
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy