----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergey Babkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael C . Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jeremiah Gowdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:09 AM Subject: Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium > Anothing interesting point is that the optimisation for IA-64 > seems to be highly processor-specific: the code optimized for > Itanium won't be optimal for McKinley and vice versa. I've heard > an estimation of about 1.5 times speed increase due to the > model-specific optimisation. > Perhaps commercial software will need to come in (encrypted) source and be compiled to the the current processor... Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Remy Nonnenmacher
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itai... Wes Peters
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Joachim Strömbergson
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium David O'Brien
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Sergey Babkin
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Leif Neland
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Andrew Reilly
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Michael C . Wu
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium David O'Brien
- Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Jeremiah Gowdy