Some suggestions here, jemalloc, kernel threads are good ones.
Another issue may just be some change for default thread stack size.
This would explain why the RESIDENT set is the same, but the VIRTUAL grew.
-Alfred
On 10/30/12 9:56 AM, Karl Pielorz wrote:
--On 30 October 2012 19:43 +0700 Erich Dollansky
<erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com> wrote:
Depends how you mean 'the same' - on the 6.4 system it shows:
cc (GCC) 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
And, on the 9.0-S it shows:
cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
So 'same' - but different versions.
did you check the default data sizes?
How do you mean?
Now they've been running for an hour or so - they've gotten a little
larger 552M/154M and 703M/75M.
If it's not harmful I can live with it - it was just a bit of a
surprise.
And a reason to spend more money on memory. Knowing the real reason
would be better.
I can understand your surprise.
Hehe, more 'concern' than surprise I guess now...
The sendmail milter has grown to a SIZE/RES of 1045M / 454M under 9.0.
The original 6.4 machine under heaver load (more connections) shows a
SIZE/RES of 85M/52M.
The TCP listener code is now showing a SIZE/REZ of 815M/80M under 9.0
with the original 6.4 box showing 44M/9.5M
The 9.0 box says it has 185M active, 472M inactive, 693M wired, 543M
buf, and 4554M free.
At this stage I'm just a bit concerned that at least the milter code
is going to grow, and grow - and die.
I would think it would last over night so I'll see what the figures
are in the morning.
Thanks for the replies...
-Karl
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
