Hi, On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:12:22 +0000 Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_...@tdx.co.uk> wrote:
> Can anyone think of any quick pointers as to why some code originally > written under 6.4 amd64 - when re-compiled under 9.0-stable amd64 > takes up a *lot* more memory when running? > is it still the same compiler? > As an example, under 6.4 the size/res for one reported by top is > 81Mb/48Mb > - and for the other is 44Mb/9Mb [this is after it's been running for > weeks]. > I assume that it is a plain FreeBSD program without X. Erich _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
