On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote: > > > + log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n", > > + ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit); > > You're the second person other than me to request this. :-) > The third, in fact!
> So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous > "enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts? > I think, the "disabled" messages output should be put under `if (verbose)'. -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the r...@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, r...@freebsd.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
