On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:

> +               log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
> +                   ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit);

You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)

So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
"enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to