> > + log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n", > > + ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit); > > You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)
Yes, i've seen it suggested before alright.. > So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous > "enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts? I don't have any objections, so developers speak up and have your say !! apart from the tun0 problem that I described in previous messages the suggested change seems to work perfectly.. - Cillian PS: any thoughts on the other vapourware idea :P ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
