:On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
: Matthew Dillon <dil...@apollo.backplane.com> wrote:
:
: > I'm sure the feeling is mutual. More to the point, I really seriously
: > doubt that any of the core developers would consider this idea either
: > because it's been rejected in the past and, so far, nobody has offered
:
:Core developers for who? FreeBSD? Fine! I wouldn't ever run it! :-)
:
: -- Jason R. Thorpe <thor...@nas.nasa.gov>
Maybe if I call the sysctl "vm.crashmenow". No, that will just make more
people actually try it. It might be doable as a compile-time option,
since you wouldn't be able to run anything approaching standard on
such a system anyway. I don't see much use for it myself. As I said
before, there are easier ways to manage memory that are not quite as
arbitrary as simply refusing a potential overcommit.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dil...@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
