On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:16:07 -0700 Mike Smith <m...@smith.net.au> wrote:
> Matt's point, which he's not making by virtue of talking too much, is > that you can't make a "no overcommit" system behave like an "overcommit" > system, and most people are used to the sort of things that the latter > makes practical. That's just silly. If people want a no-overcommit system, they have it, and if they don't, they have that, too. That's why you make it a switch. No, really, you *can* just make it a switch. -- Jason R. Thorpe <thor...@nas.nasa.gov> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message