* Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000605 16:19] wrote: > Well, it would be nice to auto-load or unload any module that is > needed. not just ethernet and fs types. That's basically the > idea. Say, if you load a driver that uses some resources that > another one can use while the first one is off... that's what > I'm talking about. Oh, I see, too me it seems like a lot of work for not that much gain, nowadays with pnp and pci the reasource conflict game isn't nearly as bad. However if you come up with a design/implementation based on the current source I'm sure people would like to see it. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Bill Fumerola
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Chris Costello
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Jeroen C. van Gelderen

