> Mike Smith wrote: > [...] > > This is, IMO, a good idea. I certainly don't want some smartass daemon > > unloading a module just because it thinks it should. 8) > > You can always patch kldunload and have cron periodically execute a > kldunload --unused-modules > Or? I have no faith at all any metric other than one determined by the module itself to indicate "unuse", and if a module wants to unload itself due to "unuse", it can already do so. I don't want or need a daemon to do this. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Bill Fumerola
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Chris Costello
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Bjoern Fischer
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Matthew Dillon
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Robert Watson
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Warner Losh
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Peter Wemm
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Warner Losh