On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > Not realistically. First of all, most "scruffy unshaven hackers" are not > qualified to make serious changes to important drivers. they might be able > to find a stray pointer, but not to make structural improvement. This is just silly. > Another point is that Open Source is virtually synonomous with "Totally > undocumented". This is sillier. > My point was that because of open source you have an unfinished product > that never gets finished. That's the description of a product that is still alive. A product on which development stops is a dead product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory..... Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory..... Michael Bacarella
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theo... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... David Greenman
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Wes Peters
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Sergey Babkin
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Michael Bacarella
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Joe Abley
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Joe Abley
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Nate Williams
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Chuck Robey
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Wes Peters
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Boris Popov
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in ... Marco van de Voort