> >solution: > > Don't specify addresses via jail(2), and let kernel select > > any non binded address. > > No, that doesn't work. People want to run servers so they want > to know their IP for DNS. Hmmm, I wish if I could just let jail(2) pass DNS name into the kernel, but the implementation in the kernel won't be easy nor clean.... Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Jamie Bowden
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Warner Losh
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Pierre Beyssac
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Daniel C. Sobral