> I'm not against adding IPv6 functionality to jail(2), my point is > merely that until somebody who has sufficient time & ability to > fiddle with it does it, it's not going to happen. > > The usual rule applies: > > "Great idea, why don't you send me patches which does this ?" OK, then I'll try making patches and send you. My current Idea is that adding a new member, a pointer to sockaddr to the jail structure, and leave current ip_number member for backward compatibility. (Also with associated changes in kernel and the jail command) Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Thordur Ivarsson
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Ollivier Robert
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... H. Eckert
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Ollivier Robert
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Warner Losh
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? sthaug
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Jamie Bowden
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Warner Losh
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Pierre Beyssac
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Rodney W. Grimes