Terry Lambert wrote: > > Make sure that the system you are talking to over the proxy is > not assumed to be a FreeBSD system (e.g. don't assume that the > vfs_default stuff exists on the other end of the proxy, or that > it would be functional). Now, Terry, that is ridiculous. One has to assume that both ends play by the same rules. That is not only a reasonably expectation, it's minimum requirement for any protocol to work. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Can I speak to your superior? - There's some religious debate on that question. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Terry Lambert